Budget proposal set for lawmakers’ vote |

Budget proposal set for lawmakers’ vote

HARRISBURG — The state House of Representatives today is poised to pass a $27.6 billion budget that’s more than the governor called for but doesn’t increase taxes.

The budget includes funds for distressed schools, flat funding for basic and higher education, and 10 percent cuts to county human services. The Legislature included $100 million in funding for educational block grants for schools that Gov. Tom Corbett’s proposal left out.

The proposed budget would cut $10 million from the Department of Environmental Protection, as Corbett called for in announcing his plan in February.

The latest budget adds about $500 million Corbett proposed chopping. Corbett recommended a $27.1 billion budget that would have cut 30 percent of state-related universities’ funding, 20 percent from county human services funding and kept basic education funding essentially flat.

When the Appropriations Committee approved the bill Wednesday, Chairman William Adolph, R-Delaware, said it was a “realistic, sustainable budget that meets the needs of Pennsylvanians.”

Distressed school districts, possibly including the Duquesne City School District, would split about $50 million in funding.

Democrats criticized cuts in the budget and voted against it in committee. Rep. Joseph Markosek of Monroeville, ranking Democrat on appropriations, said the reductions would put more pressure on local school districts, care providers and families.

Markosek also objected to Democrats’ exclusion from budget negotiations and those for a proposed petrochemical plant tax credit.

Adolph said while Democrats criticized Republican proposals they did not offer a budget of their own.

Rep. Steve Samuelson, D-Lehigh County, said the funding for education “locked in” reductions from the previous budget, in which state and federal education money dropped by nearly $1 billion.

“Yes, the proposal is to maintain funding at current levels after devastating cuts just one year ago,” he said.

Steve Miskin, spokesman for Majority Leader Rep. Mike Turzai, R-Bradford Woods, said the House will vote on other priorities this week. Those include expanding teacher evaluations to include student performance, a pilot program for human services block grants and the petrochemical plant tax credit.

Erik Arneson, spokesman for Marjoity Leader Sen. Dominic Pileggi, R-Delaware County, said the budget reflects an agreement with legislative leaders and the administration. Once the House passes the budget, he said the Senate will take it up before sending it along to the governor. The deadline for timely passage is midnight Saturday.

Michael Macagnone is an intern for the Pennsylvania Legislative Correspondents Association. He can be reached [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.