ShareThis Page
Cause of Brentwood home gun shop remains undetermined |

Cause of Brentwood home gun shop remains undetermined

| Friday, February 7, 2014 10:16 p.m

The cause of an explosion at a Brentwood home that doubled as a gun sale and repair shop remained under investigation Friday.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, along with Allegheny County Fire Marshal’s Office, were in the early stages of the investigation at a home in the 4100 block of Tuxey Avenue where an explosion occurred at about 5 p.m. Thursday, ATF special agent Steve Bartholomew said.

Bartholomew noted the investigation will include a review of utility lines, including gas and electric.

Homeowner Frank Mihalovich, 69, owner and operator of Frank’s Guns, who was home at the time of the explosion, remained in critical condition at UPMC Mercy, Uptown, Friday afternoon, according to a UPMC spokesperson. Police said he was burned on the back and head.

The Brentwood Emergency Medical Services board of director’s president is well-known in Brentwood, Mayor Dennis Troy said.

“I never heard a bad word about him and if I did hear one, I wouldn’t believe it,” Troy said.

The investigation is focused in the basement where the gun shop was, Bartholomew said. The four walls of the basement buckled and cracked in the explosion, which caused the exterior brick façade of the home to fall.

Mihalovich opened Frank’s Guns in 1976 and has an ATF license to serve as a gun dealer from his Tuxey Avenue home, Brentwood Manager George Zboyovsky said.

Stephanie Hacke is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-388-5818 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.