CCAC will be temporary Pittsburgh police training academy |

CCAC will be temporary Pittsburgh police training academy

Bob Bauder

Pittsburgh plans to temporarily relocate its police training academy from Highland Park to the Community College of Allegheny County’s North Side campus, city officials said Wednesday.

The city and CCAC are negotiating a three-year deal to use a vacant building on North Lincoln Avenue that previously served as a campus arts center. Mayor Bill Peduto and public safety officials toured the building Wednesday morning.

Under an agreement subject to approval by City Council and the school’s board of trustees, Pittsburgh would pay CCAC a total of $839,286 to lease the building and expects to spend an additional $100,000 on upgrades.

The three-story, 32,000-square-foot facility is expected to open Sept. 1 in time for a new class of police recruits and serve until the city finds a permanent training site.

Officials said the current academy on Washington Boulevard is outdated, rundown and plagued by frequent flooding. Police will continue to use its shooting range.

The CCAC building, a former vocational high school, provides enough space for parking, classrooms, physical fitness, tactical exercises and ongoing training updates for officers.

Pittsburgh is attempting to bolster police ranks depleted by retirements and resignations in recent years. The city budgeted in 2016 for nearly 1,000 officers. A new class of recruits is set to graduate on Thursday, bringing the number of officers to 850.

Two other recruit classes are scheduled for 2016.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or 412-480-7306.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.