Archive

ShareThis Page
Census shows slow Pa. population gains | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Census shows slow Pa. population gains

PTRCENSUS010414
James Knox | Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Lauren Glazin of the Hillel Jewish University Center on Friday, Jan. 3, 2014, at the center's office in Oakland. Glazin moved to Pittsburgh from London a year ago to become the director of J'Burgh, a nonprofit that works to keep young Jewish students in Pittsburgh after college.

When Lauren Glazin packed her bags a year ago to leave London for the United States, she knew what she wanted — and what she didn’t want.

“I strategically chose Pittsburgh because it’s the anti-London. There’s space. It’s cheap to live and park your car,” said Glazin, 25, of Shadyside. “I could have moved to New York or L.A., but I chose Pittsburgh. When you take the hype of a big city out of it, you get the essence of what it means to enjoy life.”

Recently released U.S. Census Bureau figures show America’s growth rate in 2013 fell to 0.71 percent. The nation added about 2.3 million people during a 12-month period that ended July 1. That marked the lowest growth rate since the Great Depression.

The Census Bureau estimated the national population on New Year’s Day at 317,297,938, about 0.7 percent higher than a year ago.

Pennsylvania remains the sixth-largest state, with an estimated 12.77 million residents — a 0.07 percent gain since 2012. The state ranked last among those showing positive gains. Maine and West Virginia were the only states that lost population.

North Dakota topped those with gains. Its population increased 3.14 percent, but the 723,000 residents are fewer than those living in Butler and Westmoreland counties combined, so the gain of 22,000 people made a considerably larger impact on its growth rate.

Texas added nearly 390,000 people, but its growth rate was 1.49 percent.

Pennsylvania added 9,326 people.

“We’ve been, for the past 30 or 40 years, a slow-growth state,” said Sue Copella, director of the Pennsylvania State Data Center.

The state experienced more international migration in recent years, but more in eastern areas than Western Pennsylvania, she said.

Detailed state information is expected this month, and information at the county level could be released in spring.

“There could be a different reason why we’re remaining steady,” Copella said, noting that factors that led to growth in 1990 might not be the same in 2014.

Like other demographic experts, Copella said growth almost always has to do with people migrating for jobs and economic reasons.

Yet figuring out what happens behind the numbers isn’t easy, said Chris Briem, a regional economist at the University of Pittsburgh.

“Pennsylvania isn’t one real economic or demographic area; it’s a lot of different regions,” he said. “Williamsport is a long way from here, and Allentown is even further.”

People follow jobs, he said.

“People are voting with their feet,” he said. “Jobs are either pulling or pushing people from Pittsburgh.”

Western Pennsylvania is entering its seventh consecutive year of positive migration. It isn’t enough to offset the disparity between deaths and births, but it is closing the gap.

“We’re the country’s only large metropolitan region that has this net population decline,” Briem said.

Some people might have stayed in Pennsylvania in recent years because the state, and particularly Western Pennsylvania, fared pretty well during the recession, said Herb Smith, a sociology professor and director of the Population Studies Center at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

Smith doubts international migration makes a big impact here.

“New York City still gets a large percentage of international migration, but for places like Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, those days are gone,” said Smith, noting the state’s dynamic immigrant boom happened a century ago.

Glazin, the former Londoner, is among the transplants bucking that trend. During college, she spent three summers working at the Jewish Community Center’s Emma Kaufmann Camp and got to know Pittsburgh.

After graduation, she spent two years in a finance banking sales job in London. Her daily commute took more than an hour, and expenses forced her to live with her parents.

This month, she became director of J’Burgh, a Hillel initiative designed to keep Jewish students in Pittsburgh. For the price of her monthly train pass in London, she can afford a one-bedroom apartment here.

“I’m making less money than in London, but it’s worth the price cut and more,” she said.

Her work visa expires in 2015, though Glazin believes she could get it extended. She intends to begin the years-long process to become a permanent resident.

“I could live anywhere easily, but I didn’t want to,” she said. “I wanted to live in America. It’s a different way of life.”

Jason Cato is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7936 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.