Clerk in Allegheny County Sheriff’s office allegedly tipped off suspects to drug investigation |

Clerk in Allegheny County Sheriff’s office allegedly tipped off suspects to drug investigation

Megan Guza

A federal grand jury on Tuesday indicted an Allegheny County Sheriff’s Office employee on charges of obstructing justice and making false statements to federal investigators, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

According to the indictment, Erika Romanowski, 40, worked as a clerk in the sheriff’s office and had access to law enforcement information, including information “related to ongoing federal investigations” with which the sheriff’s office assisted.

Sometime between February and April, Romanowski allegedly slipped information about an ongoing investigation to two of the targets of an investigation, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said.

The indictment alleged that the two individuals were associates of Romanowski’s and involved in a large-scale investigation into a violent drug-trafficking organization working out of Pittsburgh’s West End neighborhood. One of the individuals was allegedly a senior member of the drug operation.

Romanowski allegedly tipped off the targets in an effort to help them avoid being caught, according to the release.

The indictment also alleged that during a June 20 interview with FBI agents, Romanowski repeatedly lied, denying she ever leaked the information.

“Every government employee with knowledge of a criminal investigation must maintain its confidentiality, whether or not they serve in a law enforcement capacity,” said U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady. “Even more troubling, her actions could have jeopardized the safety of law enforcement officers. Corruption regardless of station will be prosecuted.”

According to the release, Romanowski faces up to 20 years in prison for the obstruction of justice charge and up to five years for lying to investigators.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.