Cybersecurity sharing act tucked into budget, despite privacy concerns |

Cybersecurity sharing act tucked into budget, despite privacy concerns

Civil liberties groups raised concerns about a federal cyber act Congress passed Friday, but its passage would help the country make progress against hackers, a top security expert told the Tribune-Review.

Leaders in the House and Senate attached the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act onto a larger omnibus spending bill that both houses passed this week and that President Obama is expected to sign into law.

The act creates a voluntary cybersecurity sharing process allowing the public and private sectors to share information on cyber threats and attacks with the federal Department of Homeland Security without legal liability issues and while protecting private information. Companies would be required to review and remove any personally identifiable information unrelated to cyber threats before sharing information with the government.

“It’s a good step forward, and the only progress we may see out of this Congress,” said James Lewis, director of the strategic technologies program at the Center for Strategic & International Studies in Washington.

“Until we see how it’s implemented, we can’t assess the effect. The idea was to remove obstacles, which is good if people intend to move.”

Some industry groups, such as banking, have groups for sharing information about online threats, but the bill seeks to increase sharing, especially with government agencies, said David Ries, a member at Clark Hill PLC, Downtown.

The key, he said, is “striking a balance between information the federal government really needs for a coordinating role and security, and not giving them too much that identifies unnecessary private details or business information.”

The bill is “dangerous” for giving intelligence agencies too much authority, and it does not go far enough to address existing problems such as unencrypted files, out-of-date software and user errors, said the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco nonprofit that advocates for Internet privacy.

“CISA — and its amendments — do not even begin to address these serious problems,” the foundation said in a statement. “Instead, they mandate information sharing with the intelligence community, creating even more cyberspying.”

Demands for cybersecurity legislation have arisen as a result of concerns over cyber attacks from China, Russia, Iran and North Korea and cyber thieves stealing trade secrets of American companies.

Hackers have stolen personal data and information in hacks on Target and health insurer Anthem, and temporarily delayed release of a Sony Pictures comedy movie that North Korea deemed offensive.

Even the federal Office of Personnel Management, the State Department and the White House have come under cyber attack.

Andrew Conte is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Contact him at [email protected] or 412-320-7835.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.