Archive

Downtown traffic a mess as protesters take to streets | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Downtown traffic a mess as protesters take to streets

PTRPROTEST1030414
James Knox | Tribune-Review
Silas Russell of the SEIU leads the crowd in chants during a protest in front of UPMC headquarters on Monday, March 3, 2014, filling one lane of Grant Street in front of the U.S. Steel Tower in downtown Pittsburgh.
PTRPROTEST2030414
James Knox | Tribune-Review
The doors to the U.S. Steel Tower are manned by extra security during a protest in front of UPMC headquarters on Monday, March 3, 2014, filling one lane of Grant Street in front of the U.S. Steel Tower in downtown Pittsburgh.
ptrprotest030414
James Knox | Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
Hundreds of protesters gather outside the U.S. Steel Tower in downtown Pittsburgh to raise awareness for UPMC wage policies on Monday, March 3, 2014.
PTRPROTEST8030414
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
A Pittsburgh police officer who declined to give his name stands in front of a line of protestors stretched across Grant Street outside the U.S. Steel Tower in downtown Pittsburgh as UPMC workers, union workers and other protesters call for higher wages for UPMC workers on Monday, March 3, 2014.
PTRPROTEST10030414
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Dawn Bagley of Robinson, a member of Local #85, moves from Grant Street to the sidewalk where protestors briefly blocked traffic outside the U.S. Steel Tower in downtown Pittsburgh as UPMC workers, union workers and other protestors called for higher wages for UPMC workers on Monday, March 3, 2014.
PTRPROTEST7030414
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Protesters make their way through downtown Pittsburgh to conclude their protest and meet to talk about future action as a part of a 'Good Jobs, Healthy Pittsburgh Day of Action' calling for an increase in hourly wages for UPMC Workers on Monday, March 3, 2014.
PTRPROTEST9030414
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Brandon Neal, 27, of Detroit walks past 10th Avenue in downtown Pittsburgh as UPMC workers, union workers and other protesters call for higher wages for UPMC workers on Monday, March 3, 2014. Neal heard of the protests through the SEIU and GoodJobsNow.org and came to Pittsburgh to stand with the unions.
PTRPROTEST6030414
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Zach Westerfer of Pittsburgh takes to Grant Street outside the U.S. Steel Tower in downtown Pittsburgh as he rallies with UPMC workers, union workers and other protesters on Monday, March 3, 2014. Protestors spilled into Grant Street and briefly blocked rush hour traffic as a part of a 'Good Jobs, Healthy Pittsburgh Day of Action' calling for an increase in hourly wages for UPMC Workers.
PTRPROTEST3030414
James Knox | Tribune-Review
Rob Hill, a union janitor at CMU, leads the crowd in chants during a protest in front of UPMC headquarters March 3, 2014, filling one lane of Grant Street in front of the U.S. Steel Tower.
PTRPROTEST4030414
James Knox | Tribune-Review
The police shut down a lane of Grant Street during a protest in front of UPMC headquarters March 3, 2014, in front of the U.S. Steel Tower.

Hundreds of protesters obstructed rush-hour traffic and forced the Port Authority of Allegheny County to juggle Downtown bus schedules for hours on Monday, and union organizers promised more action on Tuesday.

They’re waging a vocal campaign against health care giant UPMC, which issued no statements about the disturbance.

Observers and Downtown workers ranged from sympathetic to cynical as they reshuffled workday routines to get around the sometimes-rowdy crowd, which Pittsburgh police estimated at 1,000 to 1,200 near its midday peak outside the U.S. Steel Tower. Organizers vowed to return but didn’t specify plans.

“Really, just crossing the street is bad,” said Deja Francis, 21, of Highland Park, a Downtown worker who lamented the noise and traffic that overtook Grant Street from Sixth to Seventh avenues. “I think it’s a little bit too much of a disturbance.”

Union activists who want better pay and unionization for UPMC service workers began assembling before 9 a.m., when they led a march from the Boulevard of the Allies to UPMC headquarters at U.S. Steel Tower.

They apparently broke the terms of their city event permit, which allows them to demonstrate through 6 p.m. Tuesday on public sidewalks outside U.S. Steel Tower. Union representatives repeatedly declined to answer questions for publication.

Police closed both northbound lanes of Grant Street at Sixth Avenue for about four hours as protesters spilled into the street. They kept the curbside lane closed until about 5 p.m., just after a last-minute rally by protesters who blocked both streets for about 10 minutes.

Protest organizers said an outpouring of demonstrators and the closure of an outdoor plaza at the tower forced their group into the roadway. Police made no arrests and wrote no citations against the activists, who included supporters from across Pennsylvania and other states.

The protest followed a smaller demonstration Thursday, when police cited nine activists for trespassing at the tower. The Pennsylvania Interfaith Impact Network helped lead that gathering.

“We’re walking a fine line here trying to balance the First Amendment rights of the protesters with the right of everyone else who is not participating in the protest,” police spokeswoman Sonya Toler said. “As long as they comply when officers say they’ve got to get back on the sidewalk, there’s no reason to cite them.”

Toler said police agreed to turn over the northbound curbside lane of Grant Street to demonstrators, an impromptu effort “to be accommodating” for the day. She said police expect the street will be fully open Tuesday.

Other city officials spotted at the event included Councilman Dan Gilman, who told the crowd he doesn’t think Pittsburgh had seen “a labor protest like this in decades.” He wasn’t aware of the event permit but did not believe the gathering was in violation of city code, which includes provisions for free speech, Gilman said later.

“If they asked me to move, I would respect their orders,” he said.

Meanwhile, some Port Authority bus riders experienced delays as long as 40 minutes as the transit agency moved routes around the demonstrators. A bus stop near Steel Plaza was out of service for much of the day.

“It’s something we have to respond to at street level,” said Port Authority spokeswoman Heather Pharo, who reported a flurry of rider complaints via social media. She said the transit agency was awaiting word about additional demonstrations Tuesday.

“I will admit it was a big inconvenience,” said Mary Purser, 41, of Wilkinsburg, a Downtown worker who walked four blocks farther than usual because demonstrators blocked her bus stop. “You’re supposed to be helping us little people.”

Mayor Bill Peduto released a written statement late in the afternoon, saying demonstrators “exercised their First Amendment rights to peaceably assemble.” A message from his Twitter account read in part: “(C)ornerstone of free society is found in Constitutional right to assemble.”

“The mayor is concerned with public safety. If more people showed up to this peaceful event than what was expected, it’s appropriate that policies are adapted so that things can be done peacefully,” said mayoral spokesman Tim McNulty. He said he knew of no permit violations.

Ben Schmitt, 43, of Edgewood said a Port Authority bus delivered him about 20 minutes late for work. But he had no gripes.

“If I’m 20 minutes late for work, I’m OK with that if it’s for the greater good,” said Schmitt, who works in nearby Gulf Tower. “It’s a minor inconvenience for me.”

Adam Smeltz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5676 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.