Duquesne teenager convicted of third-degree murder of unborn child |

Duquesne teenager convicted of third-degree murder of unborn child

Eric Taylor

After two days of deliberation, a jury on Thursday found Eric Taylor guilty of third-degree murder for killing an unborn baby in 2014.

Taylor was also found guilty of criminal attempted homicide in the shooting of DaRae Delgado, then 15, as well as reckless endangerment, aggravated assault and firearms charges.

He is scheduled to be sentenced Aug. 3. He was charged as an adult.

Taylor, who was 15 at the time of the April 2014 shooting in Duquesne, knocked on the door of Delgado’s home and fired four times when she answered the door. One of the shots hit her in the stomach. She underwent multiple surgeries but lost her baby 31 weeks into the pregnancy.

The jurors heard the recording of testimony from LeRoy Powell, who implicated Taylor during a preliminary hearing and then was shot and killed about a week later.

Powell was one of two witnesses who placed Taylor at the scene of the shooting. During the trial, prosecutors said neighbors reported seeing three figures fleeing the scene, which was corroborated by security camera footage at a nearby funeral home.

Taylor was already in the Allegheny County Jail when he was charged with the shooting. He had been arrested on suspicion of shooting two people in Wilkinsburg the day after Delgado was shot.

Elizabeth Behrman is a staff writer for the Tribune-Review. She can be reached at 412-320-7886 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.