ShareThis Page
EDMC agrees to settle investor lawsuit |

EDMC agrees to settle investor lawsuit

| Thursday, September 17, 2015 6:18 p.m.

Education Management Corp. has agreed to pay $2.5 million to settle an investor lawsuit claiming the company misled shareholders about its compliance with state and federal education laws, according to court documents filed Thursday.

The shareholders sued in 2014 based on a separate federal lawsuit in which former employees, the Justice Department and 11 states seek to recover more than $11 billion in federal and state student aid, claiming that the Downtown-based, for-profit educator knowingly violated the law. EDMC denies the claim.

No trial date has been set.

Shareholders used the arguments in the government lawsuit to maintain they were misled about the company’s compliance with state and federal law.

The settlement, which has to be approved by U.S. District Judge David Cercone, would set aside $250,000 to administer the payments, up to one-third of the $2.5 million for attorney fees and an undisclosed amount to cover court costs.

The remainder would be divided among people who can prove they owned EDMC shares between July 1, 2011, and Sept. 16, 2014, according to court documents.

Attempts to reach EDMC officials for comment were not successful.

EDMC has four college brands — the Art Institutes, Argosy University, Brown Mackie College and South University — with enrollment that has declined 29 percent since 2010 to 112,430.

The recession hurt enrollment across the for-profit college industry. Department of Education rules that went into effect in July require for-profit colleges to prepare students better for “gainful employment” or risk losing federal funding for student loans.

Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.