Archive

Ex-gymnastics coach convicted of sexually assaulting girls | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Ex-gymnastics coach convicted of sexually assaulting girls

Natasha Lindstrom
webcourts

A jury on Wednesday found a former gymnastics coach in Allegheny and Butler counties guilty of sexually assaulting three girls, including a teenager he used to coach.

Keith Callen, 45, of Clinton Township, Butler County, was convicted of charges including aggravated indecent assault on someone under 16 and on someone under 13; sexual assault by a sports official; unlawful contact with a minor; corruption of minors; and endangering the welfare of children.

An attorney for Callen could not be reached for comment.

Police charged Callen in April after a girl he had coached privately reported being sexually abused repeatedly from age 13 or 14 to 17.

Before the sexual abuse intensified, Callen had told the victim that if he were her age, he would “ask her out,” a criminal complaint said. Callen also reportedly gave the victim inappropriate gifts, including a silver ring for Christmas that read, “Forever love.”

Two more girls came forward with allegations that Callen abused them in the early 2000s, when they were 6 or 7 years old, prompting police to file additional charges against Callen in July.

While jurors were deliberating, Callen was spotted in the courtroom hallway holding the hand of a 16-year-old gymnastics student, whom officials did not further identify.

Allegheny County Judge Donna Jo McDaniel ruled that Callen’s behavior “was a violation of a previous no-contact order” and revoked his bond, District Attorney spokesman Mike Manko said.

Callen was taken to Allegheny County Jail, where he will remain until his May 9 sentencing.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8514 or [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.