Ex-KDKA meteorologist Jeff Verszyla to continue forecasting on social media |

Ex-KDKA meteorologist Jeff Verszyla to continue forecasting on social media

Renatta Signorini
KDKA chief meteorologist Jeff Verszyla gets his weather show ready at the KDKA weather center studio, Downtown, Wednesday, February 3, 2010. ( Tribune-Review)

Ex-KDKA meteorologist Jeff Verszyla expressed gratitude and shared his plans for the immediate future in a radio interview Tuesday morning.

He told the Bubba Show on Star 100.7 that he reflected on his 23-year career during the weekend after breaking the news on social media Friday that he had been let go by KDKA. He read the messages viewers and others sent him on social media during the weekend and said he was “overwhelmed and humbled” by them.

“For 23 years, it’s been such an amazing ride to have the opportunity to work at the station that I grew up watching,” Verszyla said during the interview.

Officials at the station declined to comment when contacted by the Tribune-Review on Friday.

He thanked the “broadcast icons” and other coworkers — on-screen and behind the scenes at the television station — for the relationships they shared. He had some words for viewers, too.

“None of this is possible without the people that sat in front of their TV every night, turned it on,” Verszyla said, getting choked up. “I told myself I wouldn’t get emotional.”

Verszyla said he plans to stay in his hometown Pittsburgh and offer his thoughts on the weather through his social media channels.

“I’m not going to let 23 years of expertise in the weather field and meteorology go to waste,” he said during the radio interview. “It’s part of who I am and part of what I will continue to do in terms of forecasting the weather and throwing it out there.”

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.