Ex-Ross man Tim Boczkowski, who killed 2 wives in 2 states, could get parole in North Carolina |

Ex-Ross man Tim Boczkowski, who killed 2 wives in 2 states, could get parole in North Carolina

Megan Guza
Timothy Boczkowski is led into the courtroom for the jury's verdict in his murder trial, Wednesday, May 5th, 1999. Boczkowski was found guilty of first degree murder.

A former Ross man convicted of killing two wives in two states could be released early after serving 22 years of his life sentence in North Carolina.

Tim Boczkowski, 63, was charged in 1994 with the death of his first wife, Elaine Boczkowski, in Greensboro, N.C. She was found dead in a bathtub in 1990, according to the Virginian-Pilot. Those charges came only after he was arrested in Ross for the murder of his second wife, Maryann Boczkowski. She was found dead in the hot tub at their home.

North Carolina eliminated parole in October 1994. The state’s parole commission weighs when to release inmates whose crimes were committed prior to the elimination.

Boczkowski was convicted in North Carolina and sentenced to life in prison in 1996, according KUTV. He was sentenced to death in 1999 for the Pennsylvania killing, but the decision was thrown out by the state Supreme Court in 2004 because prosecutors violated an order indicating Boczkowski not be extradited.

Prosecutors used Boczkowski’s life sentence in North Carolina to qualify him for the death penalty in Pennsylvania, according to the TV station. He was subsequently resentenced to life in prison in Pennsylvania.

The North Carolina parole commission is gathering information as they weigh Boczkowski’s release, according to the Pilot. He could be released as early as next month, at which point he will face a life sentence in Pennsylvania.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.