ShareThis Page
Family of Antwon Rose has a long road to justice, attorneys say |

Family of Antwon Rose has a long road to justice, attorneys say

Jamie Martines
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Antwon Rose's mother, Michelle Kenney, is comforted during a press conference with their family attorney inside of the Allegheny County Courthouse on June 27, 2018.
The family of Antwon Rose and its legal team talk to reporters Wednesday, June 27, 2018, after the Allegheny County District Attorney's Office announced it was charging the police officer who shot and killed Rose with homicide. (Photo by Jamie Martines)
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Antwon Rose's mother, Michelle Kenney, is comforted during a press conference with their family attorney inside of the Allegheny County Courthouse on June 27, 2018.

The legal team for Antwon Rose’s family was outraged Wednesday at news that the police officer charged with homicide for shooting and killing the 17-year-old was out of jail.

Rose’s family stood with the attorneys as they held a news conference inside the Allegheny County Courthouse.

Lawyers said charges against Michael Rosfeld, an East Pittsburgh officer, were only the first of many hurdles they will need to clear in order to achieve justice for Antwon Rose.

“In fact, we’re already dealing with one now: How do we feel as a family and as a legal team about the fact that the individual charged with homicide was placed on $250,000 unsecured bond, which means that he will go home without paying a dollar out of his pocket,” said Fred G. Rabner, attorney for the family.

The Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office opposed the judge’s bail decision but initially decided not to contest it further.

“We vigorously argued against bond this morning,” said Mike Manko, a spokesman for District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. “We do think it was an improper ruling by the magistrate.”

Zappala’s office brought those concerns to President Judge Jeffrey A. Manning, according to a statement issued later that day.

“Our office informed Judge Manning of our concerns and Judge Manning then issued an order reinforcing the unsecured $250,000 bond while adding the condition of electronic home monitoring,” the statement said.

S. Lee Merritt, who is also representing the family, called Rosfeld’s release Wednesday “inappropriate.”

“When you have murder one, to have no bail, to have put up no property, to have to offer no cash, is very, very unique and it shows a system that is bent in favor of law enforcement,” Merritt said.

As the attorneys spoke, Zappala was detailing the charges against Rosfeld to members of the media four floors above in the Gold Room of the courthouse.

Zappala opened his remarks on the case by saying he had just met with Rose’s family. Zappala called the family “wonderful people.”

Merritt said they discussed with Zappala the option of turning over the case to the attorney general’s office or some other oversight body. Merritt said Zappala conveyed to them he was open to the idea.

“And we as a family and as a legal team will discuss it further and we will do whatever we feel is in the best interest of Antwon Rose,” Merritt said.

During his news conference, Zappala was asked if he had offered to recuse himself from the case while talking to the family this morning. Zappala said he hadn’t.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.