Federal jury finds Pittsburgh man guilty for Frick Park gun case from last October |

Federal jury finds Pittsburgh man guilty for Frick Park gun case from last October

Chuck Biedka

A federal jury in Pittsburgh on Thursday found a city man guilty of carrying a gun even though his criminal record means he wasn’t allowed and for violating probation.

After the verdict, U.S. District Court Judge Reggie Walton ordered Nazim Burton, 41, of Kedron Street, Pittsburgh, jailed until sentencing.

At trial prosecutors presented testimony that Burton crashed a car into a parked car on South Braddock Avenue on June 24, 2017. A witness told police he was carrying a silver handgun.

Burton was arrested in Frick Park standing next to a garbage can. A loaded, silver semi-automatic was inside the can. Burton also was found to have a blood alcohol content of 0.27 percent, three times the legal limit.

In addition, prosecutors said Burton was convicted in 2006 in U.S District Court in Pittsburgh for conspiracy to distribute at least 50 grams of crack cocaine and at least 500 grams of cocaine. He was on federal supervised release at the time of his arrest and was ordered to never again have a gun.

Sentencing is scheduled for Nov. 30.

The judge revolved Burton’s bond and ordered him jailed until sentencing, prosecutors said.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police conducted the investigation.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter @ChuckBiedka.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.