ShareThis Page
Feds: New York man guilty in $2 million drug case, his co-defendant is on the run |

Feds: New York man guilty in $2 million drug case, his co-defendant is on the run

| Thursday, December 13, 2018 7:48 p.m

A New York City man accused of transporting an estimated $2 million worth of heroin along Interstate 80 in January 2016, was found guilty this week in a federal trial in Pittsburgh.

A man was traveling with him escaped from house arrest and is being sought.

The jury deliberating for about an hour on Wednesday , Dec. 12, before finding Juan Wilquin Hernandez-Bourdier guilty of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute heroin and possession of heroin, federal prosecutors said. He is scheduled to be sentenced May 10, prosecutors said.

In the trial before U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton, prosecutors said Bourdier was a passenger in a vehicle that state police stopped on Interstate 80 on Jan. 20, 2016. A trooper found a “trap” in the vehicle that hid four rectangular blocks containing 4,195 grams — more than 9 pounds — of heroin.

The outer layers of wrapping on those blocks consisted of coffee grounds and plastic wrap.

Lab analysis located two fingerprints of the driver on the kilogram packages and a box of plastic wrap and coffee grounds were contained within a backpack in the van.

Lab analysis of a toothbrush in the backpack with the coffee grounds and plastic wrap revealed the DNA of Hernandez-Bourdier.

A Drug Enforcement Administration agent estimated that the 210,000 stamp bags worth of heroin Bourdier was transporting was valued at more than $2 million on the street.

The driver of the vehicle, Habys Meran, while on house arrest, cut off his house arrest bracelet and fled.

He is currently a wanted fugitive. Anyone with information regarding his whereabouts may contact the United States Marshals Service Fugitive Unit at 412-644-6627.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.