Former Elizabeth Borough chief charged with stealing drug evidence |

Former Elizabeth Borough chief charged with stealing drug evidence

Megan Guza
Former Elizabeth Borough police Chief Timothy Butler

Former Elizabeth Borough police Chief Timothy Butler, who resigned Tuesday night, is accused of stealing drugs from the department’s evidence room.

Thousands of empty bags of heroin evidence were found throughout Butler’s office, authorities said. He’d been with the department for nearly two decades, and he was appointed chief in 2014.

Butler, 42, of Finleyville, turned himself in to authorities Thursday morning. He was arraigned and released on non-monetary bond. A bond hearing is scheduled for Friday.

He is charged with two counts of theft by unlawful taking, two counts of theft by failure to make required deposits, two counts of drug possession and one count of obstruction of justice.

Butler’s officers noticed “suspicious behavior” Dec. 6 when he was seen interacting with a man found in possession of suspected heroin, according a criminal complaint. Questioned by officers, the man told them he was making controlled drug buys for Butler.

Sgt. Garrett Kimmell said it was unlikely he would be unaware of such an investigation.

The next day, Kimmell confronted Butler about his behavior, according to the complaint. He first denied having any problems but then allegedly told his sergeant he was addicted to heroin.

“Butler explained he became addicted after taking prescribed Vicodin for neck and back pain and blamed the doctors,” District Attorney’s Detective Lyle Graber wrote in the complaint.

Kimmell asked Butler if there was any missing evidence.

“It was a mess,” he replied, according to the complaint.

Kimmell asked how bad it was.

“Butler stated that ‘it was all gone,’ that any heroin in evidence was all gone,” according to the complaint.

Kimmell alerted borough officials, and Butler turned in his badge, gun and evidence key and was placed on leave and driven home, investigators said.

Graber wrote that Butler wept in a Dec. 10 meeting with the borough solicitor and other officials, apologizing and saying “he could not believe this was happening to him,” according to the complaint.

“Butler also blamed the doctor, relating ‘once they got me off the pills, I had no choice,’” Graber wrote.

Kimmell and Clairton police officers searched Butler’s office. In his trash can were approximately 2,700 loose stamp bags and 62 bundles, which each contain 10 bags, according to the complaint. They were empty.

In and around Butler’s desk, investigators found 535 loose stamp bags – all empty. An evidence envelope labeled as containing “approx. 2531 bags of heroin” was found empty, according to the complaint.

More evidence was missing from the evidence room.

One evidence envelope supposed to contain 1,000 stamp bags actually held 900 empty bags. Another empty envelope was supposed to contain 146 bags and had 134 empty bags inside. Another envelope held 554 empty stamp bags instead of the 627 full bags it was supposed to contain.

Butler, according to the complaint, was also in charge of collecting and depositing parking meter money. In previous years, the total had been between $4,000 and $6,000. No deposit was made in 2017.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.