Former McKeesport man pleads guilty to federal drug, gun charges |

Former McKeesport man pleads guilty to federal drug, gun charges

Jeff Himler

A former McKeesport man has pleaded guilty to federal drug and gun charges.

Thomas Thornton, 42, entered a guilty plea to four counts before Senior U.S. District Judge Donetta W. Ambrose in Pittsburgh — including charges of conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute heroin and cocaine, being a convicted felon in possession of firearms and ammunition, and possession of firearms in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime.

According to information received by FBI investigators, Thornton conspired to distribute drugs with another individual, was buying fentanyl and had several guns, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady announced Thursday.

Executing a search warrant May 22 at Thornton’s McKeesport residence, agents recovered two loaded weapons, a 9mm semi-automatic handgun and a .45-caliber handgun, along with ammunition, two tactical vests, heroin, cocaine, scales, a case of cough syrup and two cell phones.

Thornton admitted to selling drugs after being fired from a job, initially buying marijuana from a source in California, Brady said. Thornton later bought cough syrup from Texas to sell for profit and also admitted buying heroin, cocaine and ecstasy pills from that state.

He admitted to receiving the 9mm firearm in exchange for 50 stamp bags of heroin.

Ambrose scheduled sentencing for April 2.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter @jhimler_news.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.