ShareThis Page
Former Mt. Pleasant woman accused of ID theft, $144K fraud |

Former Mt. Pleasant woman accused of ID theft, $144K fraud


A former Westmoreland County woman has been indicted by a federal grand jury in Pittsburgh on charges of violating federal wire fraud and identity theft laws.

Jennifer Lynne Clark, also known as Jennifer Gill, 40, formerly of Mt. Pleasant, is accused of two counts of wire fraud and two counts of aggravated identity theft.

She is living in Clearwater, Fla.

According to prosecutors, from August 2015 to October 2016, Clark obtained credit card information for company credit cards belonging to her employer.

She allegedly set up mobile payment accounts with Square, Inc., in the false names of other businesses, and used the credit card information to authorize fraudulent payments into her personal bank account.

The indictment alleges Clark was responsible for fraudulent transactions totaling about $144,000. Clark allegedly used credit card numbers that were assigned to specific employees.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Adam N. Hallowell is prosecuting the case.

The U.S. Postal Inspection Service and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement/Homeland Security Investigations conducted the investigation.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.