Former Penn Hills doctor sentenced to 5 years in prison for insurance fraud |

Former Penn Hills doctor sentenced to 5 years in prison for insurance fraud

Emily Balser

A former Penn Hills doctor has been sentenced to five years in federal prison for illegally prescribing drugs and defrauding insurance companies.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office in Pittsburgh announced Tuesday that Brent Clark, 55, was guilty of illegal distribution of oxycodone and amphetamine and health care fraud.

Clark was ordered to pay nearly $226,000 in restitution and $51,000 in fines, according to U.S. Attorney Scott Brady.

He also was ordered to forfeit $131,000, the building where he had his medical practice and committed the crimes, his federal Drug Enforcement Administration prescribing number, his state medical license and a vehicle.

According to information presented to the court, from February 2015 through March 2017, Clark illegally distributed oxycodone on 13 occasions, and amphetamine on three. The government found that Clark swindled United Health Care, Medicare and Medicaid out of money for health care benefits, items and services.

Upon his release from prison, Clark must serve three years of supervised release.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter @emilybalser.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.