ShareThis Page
Hearing for East Pittsburgh Officer Michael Rosfeld relocated over security concerns |

Hearing for East Pittsburgh Officer Michael Rosfeld relocated over security concerns

East Pittsburgh police Officer Michael Rosfeld was charged with criminal homicide in the killing of 17-year-old Antwon Rose.

The preliminary hearing for East Pittsburgh Officer Michael Rosfeld will be moved from Pittsburgh Municipal Court because of security concerns, according to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

In a social media post Wednesday, the office said the preliminary hearing — currently set for July 27 — has been relocated to the Allegheny County Courthouse.

Mike Manko, spokesman for the District Attorney’s Office, said there have been no specific threats made against anyone involved in the case, but “all the parties are more comfortable moving the hearing … because of the sheer number of people who are paying attention to this case.”

Law allows preliminary hearings to be moved to a different location “for reasons of emergency, security, size or in the interest of justice,” according to the motion filed last week.

The court order to move the hearing — which was requested by the District Attorney’s Office — was signed by Common Pleas President Judge Jeffrey A. Manning.

Rosfeld faces one charge of criminal homicide in the June 19 shooting death of 17-year-old Antwon Rose. Rose was unarmed and running away from Rosfeld when the police officer opened fire, hitting Rose three times.

Rosfeld remains free on $250,000 unsecured bond and is under electronic monitoring.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.