Archive

ShareThis Page
Historical markers approved for 21 sites around Pennsylvania | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Historical markers approved for 21 sites around Pennsylvania

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, March 5, 2014 11:00 p.m

The familiar landmark of St. Nicholas Roman Catholic Croatian Church — with its onion-shaped domes overlooking Route 28 on the North Side — may be gone, but the state is making sure that it is not forgotten.

The Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission announced Wednesday the approval of historical markers for the St. Nicholas site and 20 others. Two other sites include one commemorating the boyhood home of the late public television host Fred Rogers in Latrobe and Joseph Flannery’s Standard Chemical Co., former home of the first commercial production of radium in the United States, in Oakland.

“It still breaks my heart that the church is gone,” said Susan Petrick, secretary of the Preserve Croatian Heritage Foundation, which nominated the site for the marker and opposed St. Nicholas parish’s decision to demolish the church with the approval of Bishop David A. Zubik. “It does help with the healing process to have the historical marker.”

The 21 cast aluminum, blue markers with gold lettering will join nearly 2,300 on roads and streets around the state.

Howard Pollman, spokesman for the state commission, said the markers are usually installed within a year of their approval. He said the church marker would be installed about 100 feet above Route 28. PennDOT, which is widening the state road, is planning to erect some interpretive panels on the site.

The marker for the demolished chemical company will be installed at the southeast corner of Forbes and Meyran avenues. At one time, the plant produced more than half of the world’s supply of radium.

Bill Zlatos is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7828 or bzlatos@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.