Homicide charge added against Point Breeze teen after gunshot victim dies |

Homicide charge added against Point Breeze teen after gunshot victim dies

Megan Guza

A 15-year-old Point Breeze boy faces homicide charges after a teen he shot in the head this month died this week, authorities said.

Taymar Smith was initially charged with aggravated assault, reckless endangerment and a firearm violation in the Nov. 18 shooting of Chammire Smith, no relation, at a home in North Braddock.

Police filed a homicide charge Wednesday, a day after Chammire Smith, 15, was pronounced dead at Forbes Regional Hospital from a gunshot wound to the head, authorities said.

Police initially responded to Cliff Street shortly before 10 a.m. for a report of a shooting, where they found Chammire Smith wounded and unresponsive in an alley, according to the criminal complaint. Officers followed a blood trail to a nearby home.

Taymar Smith told police he’d been in a third-floor bedroom with Chammire Smith and four others. Chammire Smith was sitting on a milk crate while Taymar Smith said he was “messing around” with a black rifle.

He told police he pointed the rifle at the victim’s head “and the gun went off,” hitting him in the head, according to the complaint.

Taymar Smith said he dropped the rifle to the floor and ran downstairs to TaSean Gray’s bedroom and said he’d accidentally shot the other boy, according to the complaint. He and Gray carried the injured teen out into the alley, and they tried to clean up the blood with a sweatshirt.

According to the complaint, Taymar Smith said he and Gray hid the bloody sweatshirt behind a speaker.

Police wrote in the complaint they found blood stains in the first-floor dining room, as well as a spent .22-caliber cartridge on the stairs that led to the second floor. They also found a pair of blood-stained Nike shoes in a backpack in the living room.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.