ShareThis Page
Ideas pour in to replace Pittsburgh’s controversial Stephen Foster statue |

Ideas pour in to replace Pittsburgh’s controversial Stephen Foster statue

Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
The statue of Stephen Foster sits in Oakland on Friday, Aug. 25, 2017.
Daisy Elizabeth Lampkin
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
The statue of Stephen Foster in Pittsburgh's Oakland section.

They include an abolitionist, suffragette, newspaper editor, entrepreneur, educator, police officer and several musicians — and all are black women.

They’re among a growing list of nominees suggested as subjects for a monument to honor African American women in Pittsburgh that will replace a landmark statue of songwriter Stephen Foster that’s sparked controversy for years. Pittsburgh is planning to move the Foster statue next month and place it in storage while searching for a permanent home in a private location, Mayor Bill Peduto said.

“I find it to be really interesting as I’m learning about people that I had not heard of before as people and friends are sending recommendations,” Peduto said. “This morning, I got (an email) from a school teacher who wants to make it an assignment for her class. … That’s exactly the type of interaction that we’re looking for.”

Pittsburgh has asked the public to weigh in and offer online suggestions for the replacement. The survey so far has prompted nearly 800 responses, according to Lindsay Powell, a policy analyst in the mayor’s office, who is helping to steer the project.

“I think that’s the wonderful thing about this project. I’m learning so much,” Powell said.

But some of the responders have objected to the city honoring black women. Two callers wanted to know why the city isn’t honoring white women, said Keyva Clark, Peduto’s spokeswoman, who took those calls.

“I keep getting all the divisive ones,” she said.

Powell said officials realized while discussing the Foster statue’s fate that among the 168 city-owned public art exhibits, few were dedicated to women and none of them recognized black women.

“I’m interested in learning about great Pittsburghers, and I would hope that people could put any controversy behind them and understand that a major city like Pittsburgh should never be in a situation where there isn’t one recognition of African American women after they’ve contributed so much to the city,” Peduto said.

Some of the names are familiar:

• Pianist Patricia Prattis Jennings of Rosslyn Farms, who performed for decades with the Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra and in 1966 became the first black woman signed to a full contract with a major American symphony orchestra.

• The late Helen Faison, who earned bachelor’s, master’s and doctorate degrees from the University of Pittsburgh and became the first black female principal of a school in the city. Pittsburgh Faison K-5 in Homewood is named in her honor.

• Gwendolyn J. Elliott, late founder of Gwen’s Girls, a nonprofit dedicated to helping girls living in poverty, and the city’s first black female police commander.

Others have stumped Peduto, a student of Pittsburgh history.

“I didn’t realize that the first (black) woman to head a major newspaper worked for the Courier,” Peduto said.

He was referring to the late Hazel B. Garland, who served as editor-in-chief of the New Pittsburgh Courier.

Other nominees include Daisy Elizabeth Lampkin, who died in 1965, a suffragette and the first woman elected to the national board of the NAACP, and acclaimed East Liberty jazz pianist, Mary Lou Williams, who died in 1981.

The Foster statue has triggered controversy because it depicts Foster, who lived in Lawrenceville, standing above what many have described as a black slave strumming a banjo. Critics describe it as demeaning to blacks, while others view it as Foster gaining inspiration from a black musician.

It stands along Forbes Avenue at the entrance to Schenley Park.

“We will have an alternative location where we will safely store it inside until such time that we will find a new home,” Peduto said.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312, or via Twitter @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.