In-person tax appeals may change in Allegheny County |

In-person tax appeals may change in Allegheny County

Allegheny County taxpayers could appeal their property assessments online or through the mail and avoid making a trip Downtown, under legislation a county councilman plans to introduce on Tuesday.

Councilman Ed Kress, R-Shaler, said the proposal would require a state-certified appraiser to review independent appraisals submitted as evidence.

“The idea is to make the system fairer and more accurate for the homeowners,” Kress said.

Kress, an attorney who has represented property owners in appeal cases, suspects some homeowners don’t appeal because going Downtown can be inconvenient.

The controversial reassessment generated 132,728 appeals in 2012 and 2013, according to county records. The deadline to appeal 2014 property assessments is March 31.

County Manager William McKain and Jerry Tyskiewicz, the director of the Department of Administrative Services, declined to comment until the matter has gone before county council, said Amie Downs, the county’s spokeswoman.

Amy Schrempf, chair of the county’s assessment review board, and the board’s solicitor, David Montgomery, did not return calls for comment.

Under the current system, taxpayers wishing to appeal the assessed value of their properties must submit all forms and evidence to the county’s Board of Property Assessment Appeals and Review inside the County Office Building on Forbes Avenue. Property owners can appeal the value of their properties assigned by the county if they think they are too high.

Property owners can submit appeals to the Board of Viewers, the next step in the assessment appeal process, online or through the mail.

Attorney Noah Fardo, whose Shadyside firm handled more than 1,100 assessment appeals, said county reviewers often rely primarily on the evidence submitted to make a ruling, making a face-to-face meeting unnecessary. He supports requiring an appraiser to review evidence from property owners.

“Sometimes the hearing officer is an appraiser but not always,” Fardo said.

County law does not require hearing officers or members of the assessment appeals board to be state-certified appraisers.

Homeowners use appraisals as their primary evidence in appeals, said Dennis Censtra, president of the Pittsburgh Metropolitan Chapter of the Appraisal Institute. For mortgages and loans in the private sector, appraisers reviewing the work of other appraisers is common.

“I think that this would just give people confidence,” said Michael Suley, who pushed for appraiser reviews when he was the manager of the Allegheny County Office of Property Assessment. Suley was fired in 2012.

Aaron Aupperlee is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7986 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.