ShareThis Page
Investigation underway in use of deadly force against man in Wilkinsburg |

Investigation underway in use of deadly force against man in Wilkinsburg

| Wednesday, February 3, 2016 11:20 p.m.
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
'It's open season on black men, and until we deal with it in that fashion, we are at war,' said student minister Victor Muhammad, 46, of Wilkinsburg, as he spoke at the Kingsley Association in Larimer on Wednesday, Feb. 3. 2016. Muhammad was one of a roomful of people who gathered for the Alliance for Police Accountability's public meeting to discuss the use of police K-9s on suspects.
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Alliance for Police Accountability President Brandi Fisher speaks about the use of police K-9s on suspects during the organization's public meeting Wednesday, Feb. 3. 2016, at the Kingsley Association in Larimer.
Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Katherine Patterson, 69, of Wilkinsburg speaks of the shooting of Bruce Kelley Jr. on her street over the weekend during the Alliance for Police Accountability's public meeting to discuss the use of police K-9s on suspects at the Kingsley Association in Larimer on Wednesday, Feb. 3. 2016. Kelley reportedly stabbed police K-9 Aren, fatally injuring him, before Kelley was shot and killed by Port Authority police.

The Allegheny County district attorney said Wednesday his office is investigating whether a Port Authority officer was justified in using deadly force against a fleeing homeless man who had been taken down by a police dog, was stabbing it to death and was in turn killed by police.

District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. said his office sent a memo this week to police chiefs in the county asking them how they use their K-9s and what protection they offer the dogs.

His memo was sent days after Port Authority police shot and killed Bruce Tyrone Kelley Jr. Sunday in Wilkinsburg. Kelley had been drinking with his father near the busway. Kelley reportedly fought with Port Authority officers who arrived to investigate, then fled. Officers used a Taser to try to subdue Kelley, but, officials said, he continued to struggle. That’s when they let the dog, Aren, off his leash, county police have said.

Zappala told the Tribune-Review his office is investigating whether the officer’s use of deadly force was justifiable.

Zappala said he wants to make sure dogs have appropriate protection, whether a protective vest or something else, for the jobs they do for their departments.

“I’m willing to invest in that,” Zappala said. “If they have an idea that would better protect their dog, then let me know, and I will figure out a way to get that addressed.”

The police dog Aren was not wearing a protective vest. Port Authority spokesman Jim Ritchie has said that a vest might not have helped anyway, because Aren died of a stab wound to the mouth.

Aren, a 5-year-old German shepherd, had been in service with the Port Authority police for about four years.

According to Port Authority’s K-9 policy, which the Trib obtained Wednesday, a K-9 officer is supposed to give a verbal warning before releasing the dog when a police dog is used to search an outdoor area or building.

Officers should say, “Surrender now, or I will deploy a K-9 and he will find you and bite you,” the policy states.

In deciding whether to sic a police dog on a suspect, officers are supposed take several factors into consideration, including location, time of day and the potential for injury to officers, citizens or the K-9 team.

K-9 officers should consider the type and severity of the crime, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of officers and the public and whether the suspect is actively resisting arrest or attempting to avoid arrest by fighting.

When asked whether Port Authority police followed the agency’s policies during Sunday’s incident, agency spokesman Adam Brandolph referred questions to Allegheny County police and the district attorney’s office, which are handling the investigation.

“We’re not commenting on any aspect of the incident while it remains under investigation,” Brandolph said.

Federal and state laws as well as policies of individual departments define when an officer can use a K-9 to take down a suspect, said David “Lou” Ferland, executive director of the United States Police Canine Association in Washington and a retired K-9 officer.

As in all cases in which force is involved, investigators would look at those laws and policies and weigh whether the officer was justified.

“All the situations are different. Sometimes, a police officer has seconds to decide on a course of action,” Ferland said.

Eight police dogs have died nationwide in the line of duty this year, he said.

County Councilman Jim Ellenbogen, chair of County Council’s Public Safety Committee, has raised concerns about the use of Aren, who was primarily a bomb-sniffing dog.

Experts say it’s not unusual for a K-9 to be trained to detect drugs or bombs as well as serve as a line of defense for an officer.

“The dogs are versatile in that they can do multiple tasks,” Ferland said.

John Brannon, owner of Shallow Creek Kennels in Sharpsville, said most K-9s are “dual purpose dogs” trained in bomb detection and pursuits and apprehension.

The Alliance for Police Accountability, an activist group that monitors police performance and behavior, held a public forum Wednesday night in Larimer to discuss issues related to use of force.

“It is our position that we do not need to use police dogs when (trying to subdue a suspect),” said Brandi Fisher, the group’s president. “We need to use them when people are hiding in the woods. We need to use them to sniff bombs. We need to use them for things like that.”

Several in the audience said they were outraged by Kelley’s death.

“Why does someone need to be shot?” said Mel Packer, 70, of Point Breeze. “If you got them surrounded, then you simply keep them surrounded until they decide to put down the knife. But you don’t have to sic a dog on them.”

Staff writers Melissa Daniels and Megan Guza contributed.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.