Judge overturns ban by Monroeville council on temple expansion |

Judge overturns ban by Monroeville council on temple expansion

An Allegheny County judge overturned a Monroeville council decision to block a Hindu temple’s plans to expand on its property, despite municipal officials’ fears that the construction could boost the risk of landslides.

Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Joseph James approved applications Sri Shirdi Sai Baba Temple submitted to the municipality seeking permission to expand temple facilities on its Abers Creek Road property, according to a decision released Wednesday.

Temple attorney Tom Ayoob filed an appeal because Monroeville council voted 3-2 in November to reject the applications.

Municipal Manager Tim Little wrote in a letter that council rejected the application because “the proposed development is located in the general area of landslide prone soils and relatively steep slopes.”

Little and municipal Solicitor Bruce Dice could not be reached for comment.

The temple was seeking permission for a cut-and-fill operation of 24,800 cubic yards of earth to expand. It also requested special permission to build on a slope.

During public meetings, residents from nearby Turnpike Gardens said they feared the plans would cause landslides. Ayoob wrote in the appeal that council favored this “speculative and unfounded lay testimony” over that of experts from the temple as well as municipal engineers who had said that the project would not violate zoning restrictions as long as engineers used retaining walls and other safety measures outlined in their applications.

Denying the two applications prevented temple leaders from moving forward with plans to construct a 13,140-square-foot building, a 1,466-square-foot addition to the existing building and a 264-square-foot connecting wing along with four meditation gazebos, even though council approved a site plan in a separate vote.

Gideon Bradshaw is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.