Archive

Judge puts Plum school board member back on panel | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Judge puts Plum school board member back on panel

Michael DiVittorio
ptrstepnick011017
Michelle Stepnick, who was appointed by an Allegheny County judge Monday to fill the seat she vacated on the Plum school board in September.
PALSBDmugs12stepnick
Michelle Stepnick

A judge Monday appointed former Plum school board member Michelle Stepnick to the seat she’s been trying to get back since rescinding the resignation she submitted in September.

Allegheny County Judge Michael E. McCarthy ruled that her resignation created an open seat that she didn’t get back by rescinding her resignation before the school board officially accepted it. Then, the judge appointed Stepnick to “fill the current unexpired term of the vacant school board position.”

“I’m happy that this is done and behind us,” Stepnick said Monday afternoon. “I want to move on and focus on the issues we need to focus on, which is the education of our kids.”

Stepnick, who resigned prior to the start of a Sept. 27 meeting and before a vote was taken to reinstate school Superintendent Timothy Glasspool, attempted to rescind her resignation on Oct. 7.

Glasspool, before the 4-3 vote to reinstate him, was on paid leave in the wake of a grand jury report accusing him and other administrators of turning a blind eye to years of sexual abuse of female students by male high school teachers. Glasspool returned to work Oct. 3.

The board after Stepnick’s resignation started taking applications to fill her seat, and on Oct. 25 deadlocked on appointing resident Scott Coulson as her replacement. Her term expires at the end of this year.

A panel of residents petitioned the court to fill the seat after the board failed to do so. Stepnick filed a separate suit asking the judge to rule she never lost the seat because her resignation never was formally accepted.

“I’m glad the issue’s resolved and the district can move forward,” board member Richard Zucco said.

Board member Steve Schlauch echoed Zucco’s comments.

“It is what it is and I respect the judge’s decision,” said Schlauch. “As a board, we have a responsibility to more forward and tackle important issues such as the financial crisis that is facing the district and how we are going to correct it.”

A budget meeting is scheduled for 6 p.m. Tuesday at the high school library.

“I was going no matter what,” Stepnick said of that meeting. “I have a lot of questions. The last thing I want to see is a program cut or class sizes increased.”

The next regular voting meeting is 7 p.m. Jan. 24 at the municipal building.

Mike Divittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.