Archive

Man caught rummaging through cars shoots at Penn Hills cop, remains at large | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Man caught rummaging through cars shoots at Penn Hills cop, remains at large

Mary Ann Thomas
ptrpennHillsGunfire062918
Police close some Penn Hills roads after reported gunfire, June 28, 2018.

A man shot at a Penn Hills police officer who caught him rummaging through someone else’s car on Hebron Drive early Thursday and then managed get away despite a search that involved multiple agencies and two drones.

Penn Hills police Chief Howard Burton said authorities received a report around 5 a.m. that a man was looking in cars along Hebron Drive.

A responding officer found the man inside a car and flashed a spotlight on him. The man ran into nearby woods but reversed course after another officer spotted him.

The first responding officer and suspect were about 25 feet apart when they confronted each other. When the officer drew his Taser, the suspect pulled out a handgun and shot once at the officer.

“Fortunately he missed,” Burton said.

The man ran back into the woods. Burton said numerous agencies responded to help search for him. The Allegheny County Sheriff’s Office and Allegheny County Emergency Services contributed drones to the effort.

Police called off the search at 7:30 a.m.

Burton described the suspect as a 5-foot, 10-inch thin black male in his late teens or early 20s. He had dreadlocks and was wearing a black hooded sweatshirt and dark pants.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter @MaThomas_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.