ShareThis Page
Munhall man accused of stealing mail and packages pleaded guilty to federal charges |

Munhall man accused of stealing mail and packages pleaded guilty to federal charges

| Thursday, November 1, 2018 8:00 p.m

A Munhall man accused of stealing other people’s mail and packages from apartments in Pittsburgh’s Shadyside and Oakland neighborhoods pleaded guilty in federal court, federal prosecutors say.

Federal authorities say Christopher Eric Carr, 46, admitted guilt before U.S. District Judge Cathy Bissoon to four counts of conspiracy and mail theft. He’s expected to be sentenced March 12.

Carr and his co-defendant, Ron Matthew Sharp, entered multiple apartments in the Pittsburgh area from February through May and opened packages and other mail not addressed to them, according to a federal news release.

They stole numerous items, among them gift cards, and provided them to others who redeemed them at various locations such as Giant Eagle and GetGo. The pair also resold and instructed others to resell the stolen items.

Sharp, 42, of Duquesne, pleaded guilty to four counts of conspiracy and theft of mail a few weeks ago. He will be sentenced in February in federal court in Pittsburgh.

The U.S. Postal Inspection Service and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security conducted the investigation.

Michael DiVittorio is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Michael at 412-871-2367, or via Twitter @MikeJdiVittorio.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.