Newsmaker: Tony Silvestre |

Newsmaker: Tony Silvestre

Tony Silvestre, recipient of the Kerry Stoner Award

Noteworthy: The Pittsburgh AIDS Task Force will present Silvestre with the Kerry Stoner Award at its annual benefit in April. The award recognizes someone who has shown a commitment to the task force’s mission of preventing the spread of HIV and AIDS. Stoner was the task force’s first executive director. He died in 1993 of complications from AIDS. Silvestre has been involved in HIV prevention since 1984 and has recruited some 4,000 people to participate in HIV/AIDS research.

Age: 69

Residence: Highland Park

Family: Husband, Michael

Occupation: Professor of infectious diseases and microbiology at the University of Pittsburgh’s Graduate School of Public Health

Education: Bachelor’s degree in sociology, King’s College, 1969; master’s degree in sociology, Penn State University, 1979; Ph.D. in social work, Pitt, 1992

Quote: “Kerry Stoner was a very good friend of mine. Being recognized for an award created in his honor is especially sweet. My 30-plus years of working with AIDS and HIV infection has been an incredible experience that started with confronting a disease that was absolutely frightening to most people and very stigmatized. It went from very few people who did this work to large organizations with considerable state and federal support. It’s not done by any means. There’s a lot that needs to be done. But it speaks well of the human spirit.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.