ShareThis Page
Pancake King? National chains troll IHOb’s name change |

Pancake King? National chains troll IHOb’s name change

Madasyn Czebiniak
Getty Images
This May 11, 2017, file photo shows an IHOP sign at a restaurant in Hialeah, Fla.
Getty Images

IHOP, or IHOb, announced their name change promotion on Monday and the world was like, “huh?”

The pancake-slash-now-burger chain got some snark online from their competitors, new and old. Burger King, Wendy’s, Waffle House, Denny’s and other took shots at IHOP for the promotion.

Burger King trolled the IHOb name change by changing their name – at least on Twitter – to “Pancake King.”

And they got some reaction:

Wendy’s – a burger joint – posted a tweet comparing the name change to acting like a child:

And then saying pancakes are easier than burgers:

IHOb responded:

And the skirmish was resolved:

A&W Restaurants, know for burgers and root beer floats, got a little snarky with their response:

Waffle House for its part is sticking with waffles:

Whataburger (a burger chain mainly in the South and Southwest) is sticking with burgers, though they have pancakes too:

Denny’s made a different cultural reference:

IHOP has been coy about whether the name flip is permanent, saying Monday that it was “for the time being.” Pressed for details, the company would not give an end date for IHOb according to the Associated Press, but referred to the “tongue-in-cheek name change” and said it was tied to the summer burger promotion.

The name change can be seen as a success in terms of social media reach, as many people are talking about it, or at least making snarky comments about it.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.