ShareThis Page
Peduto, groups push green infrastructure to resolve Alcosan directive |

Peduto, groups push green infrastructure to resolve Alcosan directive

It would cost “hundreds of millions” of dollars to use natural stormwater absorption methods to reduce flooding in areas of Pittsburgh to help comply with a federal mandate to reduce sewage overflow into the city’s rivers, Mayor Bill Peduto said Monday.

But that’s a fraction of Alcosan’s $2 billion to $3 billion proposal to expand its sewage plant and large sewage and stormwater holding tanks under the rivers.

“If we’re able to hold the water where it lands and not put it into the broken system, we won’t need as many pipes,” Peduto said following a public meeting on flooding hosted by Councilwoman Darlene Harris of Spring Hill. “The question is, do we build it with a bunch of pipes, which would be the most costly option, or do we look at common-sense solutions with green infrastructure and lower that total cost.”

If Alcosan and state and federal regulatory agencies approve, the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority’s “Clean and Green” plan would take five to 10 years to implement, Peduto said.

Alcosan is under a federal mandate to cut in half by 2026 the estimated 9 billion gallons of sewage each year that overflows its sewer system during heavy rain and goes into the rivers.

Peduto, Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald and environmental groups such as the Sierra Club and Clean Rivers Campaign have lobbied for so-called green infrastructure, which would use such things as rain gardens and swales to collect rainwater and let it seep naturally into the ground.

James Stitt, PWSA’s director of planning, said the authority has determined that the city’s most flood-prone watersheds contain about 3,600 acres of rooftops, sidewalks and parking lots that cause rainwater runoff and flooding.

“If we can control about half of it, about 1,800 acres of that impervious surface with green infrastructure … then we will be able to manage a significant amount of the overflow,” Stitt said.

Stitt said the fix would require a series of green projects across the city totaling about 183 acres — about half the size of Allegheny Cemetery. Projects for flood-prone Washington Boulevard alone would cost $76 million to $260 million, he said.

City officials said they will implement better planning and training for public safety personnel to deal with the type of flash flooding that killed four people trapped in their vehicles on Washington Boulevard in 2011.

Public Safety Director Wendell Hissrich said police, firefighters and paramedics have been trained in water rescue and that the city would offer additional training next year.

Public Works Director Mike Gable said the city is working to repair a broken warning system to prevent motorists from driving onto Washington Boulevard during heavy rain.

Gable said warning lights that flash when water on the boulevard rises are now working, but three gates that block streets leading to the boulevard are not yet operable.

Police and Public Works employees have barricaded the streets during recent rains, Gable and Hissrich said.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.