Archive

ShareThis Page
Peduto lays out vision for ‘smart’ street grid | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Peduto lays out vision for ‘smart’ street grid

Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto on Tuesday described a futuristic city with driverless cars, traffic light systems that eliminate gridlock and vehicle applications that warn of potential collisions.

The mayor laid out his plans for spending a $50 million federal transportation grant — should the city receive it — on a day when traffic stalled en route to Carnegie Mellon University, where he was speaking. A burst water main closed Forbes Avenue, the main route leading to the CMU campus.

“You’ll still have water pipes break, but you’ll probably have something to let you know about it,” Peduto said with a laugh.

Pittsburgh is one of seven finalists for a federal Department of Transportation “Smart City Challenge” grant that it would use to develop better transportation systems and cars that can operate via high-tech networks. Allegheny County, Carnegie Mellon, the University of Pittsburgh and others assisted the city with its grant application.

Peduto said he expects to double the $50 million through corporate donations. The transportation department awarded Pittsburgh $100,000 to prepare its final application, due in April.

The $50 million would pay for infrastructure including sensors and wireless and fiber optic networks linking the entire city.

Those networks would reduce gridlock, pollution and idling traffic through “smart” traffic lights, allow vehicles to talk with each other and chart the best way for travelers to navigate confusing city streets by bus, bicycle and on foot.

Fifty intersections in the East End already are equipped with sensors that communicate with vehicles and allow traffic lights to adjust their stop-and-go times based on traffic. A program of Traffic21, a CMU research institute, the newest sensors are in 24 intersections along Baum Boulevard and Centre Avenue.

“The city is proposing to use this grant to further build out the infrastructure in Pittsburgh,” Caldwell said. “This is laying the groundwork for … who knows what in the future. It’s allowing for a system that’s allowing for all of this future technology to be applied.”

Peduto said the money would provide such things as solar-powered charging stations for electric cars on the roofs of Downtown garages and autonomous vehicles shuttling people from Oakland to Hazelwood where plans are afoot for major residential and high-tech development.

The city would create an information “platform” for others to learn of Pittsburgh’s transportation developments. Peduto said he wants to create after-school programs in recreation centers to offer science and high-tech programming to city youths.

“… The cities that start to advance the ability to change transportation will be the ones that will be in the lead not only in creating more effective and efficient and equitable routes of transportation and modes of trans, but they will be the ones that will lead in the industry and help to change their economy,” Peduto said.

Pittsburgh is competing against Austin, Texas; Columbus, Ohio; Kansas City; Denver; and San Francisco. The mayor vowed to move ahead with transportation planning even if the city does not receive the grant.

“This will take us there much faster, but we’re still going there,” he said.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312 or [email protected].


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.