Petition urges Pittsburgh Marathon to drop Chick-fil-A as sponsor of kids’ race |

Petition urges Pittsburgh Marathon to drop Chick-fil-A as sponsor of kids’ race

Megan Guza
Chik-Fil-A’s mascot, a cow, appears at an Oct. 2, 2018, event celebrating the fast food restaurant’s sponsorship of the Pittsburgh Marathon’s kids’ marathon. Images from the event were posted to the marathon’s Twitter page.

An online petition started by a Pittsburgh-based consultant is urging Pittsburgh Marathon officials to drop Chick-fil-A as a sponsor of the kids’ marathon because of the fast food restaurant’s “extreme anti-LGBTQ beliefs.”

The petition, started by Jodi Hirsh, the co-founder and principal consultant at Sequal Consulting, calls the partnership “unacceptable, damaging and offensive.” Hirsh could not immediately be reached for comment.

“Chick-fil-A is an openly homophobic and transphobic business,” according to the petition. “It has been for years, and despite their PR campaign to change their image, there’s no reason to believe they have moved away from their extreme anti-LGBTQ beliefs and their funding of discriminatory programming.”

Company president Dan Cathy in 2012 said during a national conversation about same-sex marriage that “we’re inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at him and say we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage.”

He later said he was “guilty as charged” in pushing for the biblical definition of a family. Additionally, financial records showed the company’s foundation donated millions of dollars to anti-LGBTQ foundations.

The petition encourages readers to contact P3R CEO Patrice Matamoros and includes a form letter: “Children should not be asked to run under the banner of a company that believes their sexual orientation and gender identity is something that can be cured or healed. Children should not have to support corporate bodies who want to erase them or their family members.”

Race officials held a festival last week in celebration of the “expanded partnership” with Chick-fil-A, which included an appearance by the mascot, a cow, and giveaways for children.

A day later, officials released a statement regarding growing backlash over the partnership.

“As an organization, P3R strives to be inclusive of any and all members of the Pittsburgh community, and we have and will continue to be accepting of any individual or family who wants to participate in our events,” the statement read. “We are working with organizations throughout the region to ensure we continue to expand our programming accordingly.”

The petition has gained 900 so far.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.