Archive

ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh armed robbery suspect found hiding in attic | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh armed robbery suspect found hiding in attic

Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, August 16, 2016 2:18 p.m.
ptrrobarrest021316
Pittsburgh Bureau of Police
Melissa Santoro, 28, of Banksville was charged Thursday, Feb. 11, 2016, in connection with robberies at a Sunoco and a Rite Aid.
ptrrobarrest021316
Pittsburgh Bureau of Police
Melissa Santoro, 28, of Banksville was charged Thursday, Feb. 11, 2016, in connection with robberies at a Sunoco and a Rite Aid.

A woman who said she committed four armed robberies in and around Pittsburgh earlier this year broke out of her electronic monitoring bracelet in June and was on the run until police found her hiding in an attic Tuesday in Scott, Allegheny County Sheriff’s officials said.

Authorities accused Melissa Santoro, 28, of Banksville in February of holding up a Dormont pizzeria, a Rite Aid and, on two occasions, a Sunoco in Banksville. She was sentenced to house arrest March 31 as a condition of bail, Chief Deputy Kevin Kraus said.

Deputies put Santoro’s name on the “Most Wanted” list June 3 when she removed her electronic monitoring device, Kraus said. On Tuesday, the department’s fugitive squad received a tip that Santoro was staying with a family friend in Scott.

When deputies arrived at the house, they found Santoro hiding in the attic, Kraus said. She was arrested without incident.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.