Archive

Pittsburgh City Council moves to allow bicyclists on wooded paths in parks | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pittsburgh City Council moves to allow bicyclists on wooded paths in parks

Bob Bauder

Pittsburgh City Council on Wednesday advanced legislation that would permit bicyclists to ride on wooded paths in city parks.

A city ordinance that has not been enforced prohibited mountain biking on narrow park trails, said Councilman Corey O’Connor, who sponsored an amendment to the law.

Amending the ordinance will clarify where riding is permitted and raise Pittsburgh’s status among bicycle enthusiasts, said cycling advocates who appeared before City Council.

“A lot of cities now are competing because they want to attract younger workers who want to live in a place where they don’t have to fear for their lives to ride a bicycle,” said Eric Boerer, advocacy director for Bike Pittsburgh. “This raises Pittsburgh’s status as a bike-friendly city.”

He said bicycle riders have been advocating for a policy change for years, but they didn’t press for it because the ordinance was not enforced. Mountain bikers regularly use trails in Frick, Schenley and Riverview parks, Boerer said.

O’Connor, who chairs council’s Parks and Recreation Committee, said he was unaware of the regulation until mountain biker Eryn Hughes of Point Breeze contacted his office in December.

Council unanimously approved the amendment in a preliminary vote and is scheduled for a final vote Tuesday, O’Connor said.

Bob Bauder is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-765-2312 or [email protected].


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.