Pittsburgh diocese’s Bishop Zubik ‘very sorry’ for priests’ sex crimes, says action plan to come |

Pittsburgh diocese’s Bishop Zubik ‘very sorry’ for priests’ sex crimes, says action plan to come

Jamie Martines

Seated in front of the altar at Saint Paul Cathedral in Pittsburgh’s Oakland neighborhood, Bishop David A. Zubik of the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh listened as members of the city’s Catholic community — some of them survivors of sexual abuse at the hands of clergy — shared criticism, reflections and questions following the Pennsylvania grand jury report on sexual abuse released in August.

Thursday’s session is the first of four to be held by the Diocese of Pittsburgh; the others are next week.

“All that I have heard tonight has been your sharing reflections with me,” Zubik said as he addressed attendees at the close of the session. “And so I need to thank you for your courage.”

He extended is apologies to victims and members of the Catholic community.

“I really am very sorry,” Zubik said. “Not empty words. I’m sorry that you suffered because of the church.”

After opening prayers and readings, at least 19 attendees addressed Zubik for about 90 minutes.

Those who didn’t get to speak before the program moved to closing prayers just before 9 p.m. were asked to write their comments down on cards that were collected by the session’s lay facilitators.

Ellen Mady, a diocese staff member, moderated the session. She’ll serve as moderator for upcoming sessions as well.

In addition to sharing personal stories of abuse, many of the speakers called for increased transparency as the diocese moves forward with addressing claims of abuse.

This includes more openness about how parishioners’ donations are being spent.

Several speakers urged Zubik to resign.

Speaking with reporters after the event, Zubik did not respond to calls for his resignation.

He also would not address any examples of abuse discussed during the session, except to say that an action plan outlining how the church will move forward will be released after all four sessions are complete.

That action plan will be released to the public and will be complete before Ash Wednesday, which falls on March 6, Zubik said.

The Diocese of Pittsburgh includes Allegheny, Beaver, Butler, Greene, Lawrence and Washington counties. There are 12 municipalities in the Alle-Kiski Valley served by the Diocese of Pittsburgh, with a combined population of about 52,000.

The roughly 900-page report detailed sexual abuse allegations in six Catholic dioceses around Pennsylvania, including those based in Greensburg and Pittsburgh.

The grand jury report identified 301 “predator priests” who are accused of molesting at least 1,000 victims over a 70-year period.

Of those, 20 priests worked throughout the Greensburg diocese and 99 worked throughout the Pittsburgh diocese. A string of listening sessions hosted by the Diocese of Greensburg also wrapped up in Indiana County on Thursday.

The report also detailed evidence that administrators — including bishops — permitted priests accused of sexual abuse to continue working and failed to properly investigate child abuse claims.

Remaining Diocese of Pittsburgh listening sessions are scheduled for:

  • Monday, Dec. 3 at 7 p.m., Saint Thomas a Becket Church, 139 Gill Hall Road, Jefferson Hills, PA 15025
  • Tuesday, Dec. 4 at 7 p.m., Our Lady of Fatima Church, 2270 Brodhead Road, Aliquippa, PA 15001
  • Thursday, Dec. 6, Saint Ferdinand Church, 2535 Rochester Road, Cranberry Township, PA 16066

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jamie at 724-850-2867, [email protected] or via Twitter @Jamie_Martines.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.