Pittsburgh man found guilty of raping 2 women near Westinghouse High School |

Pittsburgh man found guilty of raping 2 women near Westinghouse High School

Megan Guza
Daryl Hayden

A jury Monday convicted a man from Pittsburgh’s Homewood neighborhood of two violent rapes last summer near Westinghouse High School.

Daryl Hayden, 57, was found guilty in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court of three counts of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse; two counts each of aggravated assault, strangulation, sexual assault, possessing instruments of crime and making terroristic threats; and one count each of rape and attempted involuntary deviate sexual intercourse.

The jury deliberated Friday and Monday before returning the verdict. It acquitted Hayden of a robbery charge.

Hayden attacked his first victim June 10, 2017, behind the high school on North Murtland Street. Hayden, who was not identified for weeks after the attack, beat the woman in the face and threatened her with a box cutter before sexually assaulting her and choking her, police said. She fought off Hayden, and he ran away.

On June 21, 2017, Hayden asked another woman for a cigarette as she walked near Frankstown Avenue. The two talked and walked before Hayden suggested they hang out behind the high school.

The woman balked at the idea, and Hayden attacked her, threatening her and her unborn child with a box cutter and telling her more than once that he would kill her, police said. He sexually assaulted the woman until a car spooked Hayden and he ran away.

Police received an anonymous tip after photos taken from security cameras were released to the media. Both women chose Hayden from a photo array.

Sentencing is set for Sept. 6.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.