Pittsburgh man pleads guilty to robbing bank with sex toy bomb |

Pittsburgh man pleads guilty to robbing bank with sex toy bomb

Aaron Stein’s wedding was just days away, his honeymoon booked, when he got word that $9,000 he’d invested in foreign currency markets to pay for the trip was gone.

In a move of desperation, his attorney Bruce Carsia said, Stein made a fake bomb out of what police would later identify as phone wires, duct tape and a sex toy, and he used it to threaten tellers and rob a PNC Bank on June 15 in Crafton. He wore an Iron Man mask to hide his identity.

Stein, 36, of Elliott pleaded guilty Thursday in Allegheny County Common Pleas Court to robbery, aggravated assault, making bomb threats, making a fake bomb and four counts of reckless endangerment.

“This was completely out of character for Mr. Stein,” Carsia said. “He just panicked.”

Soon after the robbery, police from nearby Robinson found Stein pulled over on Campbells Run Road. When they ordered him to get out of his car, he admitted that he’d robbed the bank and told them the bomb was a fake. Nevertheless, Crafton police Chief Mark Sumpter called in the county’s bomb squad to detonate it as a precaution, according to a criminal complaint.

Portions of Campbells Run Road, Interstate 376 and Interstate 79 were shut down for nearly three hours, police said.

Stein spent about 18 days in the Allegheny County Jail until his bail was reduced and his father was able to post it.

He then had his belated wedding, Carsia said.

Judge Anthony Mariani revoked Stein’s bond pending his sentencing May 31.

“I’m stunned that he’s standing here as a free person,” Mariani said during the plea hearing. “This was outrageously dangerous behavior.”

Matthew Santoni is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412 391 0927 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.