Pittsburgh Planning Commission rejects controversial Penn Plaza development |

Pittsburgh Planning Commission rejects controversial Penn Plaza development

Bob Bauder
Guy Wathen | Tribune-Review
Large bands of concrete that emphasize the floors of the Penn Plaza apartments in East Liberty on Tuesday, Jan. 12, 2016.

Citing community opposition, the Pittsburgh Planning Commission on Tuesday unanimously rejected a Downtown developer’s plans to build high-end housing on the site of a shuttered low-income complex in East Liberty.

“It begins with and ends with the community engagement piece, and at the end of the day I don’t believe that there was any evidence that … the community gave input, and there weren’t things that were truly changed as a result of that,” Commissioner Lashawn Burton-Faulk said.

Plans by Pennley Park South, a subsidiary of Downtown-based LG Realty Advisors Inc., which owns the Penn Plaza complex, are now in limbo, according to Downtown attorney Jonathan Kamin, who represents the company. One of the two buildings in the complex was razed last year. The now-vacant property on Penn Avenue is surrounded by a fence.

Kamin called the decision unfair, saying the plan complies with city requirements.

“In terms of public engagement, I think more than 35 meetings with the various constituencies and groups is public engagement like the city has never had,” he said. “I don’t think that you can ask for more public engagement than what this developer has done on many different levels from the very beginning of the process.”

He said options are to submit another plan or sue.

The company founded by Lawrence N. Gumberg, a member of a family that owns commercial real estate firm J.J. Gumberg Co., intended to replace Penn Plaza with a market rate residential and retail development including a Whole Foods grocery store.

The development has been controversial since last year, when Pennley Park sent notices to about 200 residents of Penn Plaza that they had 90 days to find other housing. Residents complained that the development would encroach on a 2.2-acre park next to Penn Plaza.

Pennley Park offered relocation assistance to residents and joined the city in helping them find other housing. About 27 people remain in the last building. Residents attending the meeting praised the decision.

“I feel good about it on many levels as an extremely low-income resident of the community who has been displaced,” said Alethea Sims, 61, of East Liberty. “I’m relieved that someone Downtown is finally listening.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him 412-765-2312 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.