ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh police seek Penn Hills man in August stabbing |

Pittsburgh police seek Penn Hills man in August stabbing

Pittsburgh police have issued a warrant for a Penn Hills man they say stabbed two people in Homewood over stolen drugs last month.

Ralph Artice Anderson, 39, is charged with two counts of attempted homicide and four counts of aggravated assault, court documents show. A warrant was filed Monday after a witness on Sunday identified Anderson through a photo lineup.

The incident happened at 2:11 p.m. on Aug. 14, according to a criminal complaint. Police said they were called to Frankstown Avenue at North Homewood Avenue for a report of two people stabbed. Both victims were taken by ambulance to UPMC Presbyterian. The first victim had been stabbed in the upper back and listed in stable condition. The second victim had been stabbed in the thigh was listed in critical condition.

According to police, the first victim, identified as Witness No. 1, encountered a man known as “Black,” who had sold drugs to the witness numerous times over the past 6 months, the complaint said.

“Black” confronted Witness No. 1 over stolen narcotics, and the two began to fight. “Black” pulled out a knife and stabbed Witness No. 1 and Victim No. 2, who tried to intervene, the witness said. “Black,” later identified as Anderson, ran from the scene.

According to police, Victim No. 2 went into cardiac arrest due to the injury, had to be resuscitated and remains hospitalized.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.