Pittsburgh teen accused of Fourth of July shooting Downtown to stand trial |

Pittsburgh teen accused of Fourth of July shooting Downtown to stand trial

Bob Bauder
Nate Smallwood | Tribune Review
People downtown walk in the director of the Wood St. T-Station near where a shooting occurred on the night of July 4, 2016.
Pittsburgh Police
Pittsburgh police in September released several images, including this one, seeking help to identify a person of interest in the Fourth of July shooting Downtown that wounded four people. Police later charged Kishawn Jackson, 16, of Garfield, with attempted homicide and other offesnes.

Two groups of teenagers screaming at each other drew Rich Brannigan’s attention as he watched throngs of people leaving Pittsburgh’s Downtown after the July 4 fireworks celebration.

Brannigan, 47, testifying during a preliminary hearing Friday, said a teen in a black hooded sweatshirt drew a gun and fired three times at the opposing group. A girl, who didn’t appear to be associated with either group, dropped immediately, Brannigan said.

“He totally missed everybody and hit her,” he said. “It was bang, bang, bang, (and) everybody ran.”

Brannigan couldn’t identify the shooter, but Pittsburgh police say video footage culled from various surveillance cameras across the city indicates it was Kishawn Jackson, 16, of Garfield. Police identified Jackson from Brannigan’s description of his clothing and images showing Jackson wearing similar clothing while boarding a bus minutes after the shooting.

It was enough for District Judge Randy C. Martini to hold Jackson for trial on charges of attempted homicide, aggravated assault and related counts. He is being held in the Allegheny County Jail in lieu of $300,000 bond.

Jackson’s attorney, Casey White, said police charged the wrong teen.

“No one has identified my client as the shooter,” he said, arguing that Martini should dismiss the charges.

Assistant District Attorney Russell Broman said video evidence clearly links Jackson to the crime.

“This is what they call a circumstantial video identification,” he said.

The shots on July 4 wounded four people, including a woman who was hit in the forehead. The violence that erupted as thousands of visitors crowded Downtown for one of Pittsburgh’s largest annual events prompted outrage from Mayor Bill Peduto and District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr.

Police said a feud between rival gangs from the North Side and East End led to the gunfire.

City and county authorities have stepped up patrols Downtown and are working with the Pittsburgh Public School District to find ways to prevent such violence incidents.

White described Jackson as a high school student with good grades, who lives with family members. White said numerous people have anonymously written him and texted police that Jackson is innocent.

“We were hopeful our client would walk free today,” White said. “Our client was not the shooter.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.