Pittsburgh to ask all self-driving companies to follow mayor’s new Uber rules |

Pittsburgh to ask all self-driving companies to follow mayor’s new Uber rules

Aaron Aupperlee
Argo AI
Ford's investment in February 2017 of $1 billion over five years in the Pittsburgh self-driving car startup Argo AI sparked a record-breaking year of investment for Pittsburgh-area tech companies. (Photo from Argo AI)
Chris Urmson, CEO and co-founder of Aurora Innovation, talks with PennDOT Secretary Leslie Richards, about the development of self-driving cars during the Pennsylvania Automated Vehicle Summit on Tuesday, April 10, 2018, in Downtown, Pittsburgh. (Photo by Aaron Aupperlee)
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Uber's self-driving car fleet is parked outside the company's office in the Strip District before a test drive for media on Sept. 20, 2017.

All companies testing self-driving cars in Pittsburgh could face the same new rules that the mayor wants Uber to follow.

Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto said this week that he has asked Uber to limit its self-driving cars to 25 mph while testing and use its app to alert human drivers when they exceed the speed limit.

The city’s Department of Mobility and Infrastructure plans to discuss those rules with other companies testing self-driving cars in the city, spokesman Tim McNulty told the Tribune-Review on Friday.

“Autonomous operations are still highly experimental, and no operator has yet fully figured it out, especially in a complex urban environment like Pittsburgh,” McNulty wrote in an email. “The proposed return of Uber testing was a unique opportunity to introduce the concept, but DOMI would urge any AVs testing in a pedestrian-heavy environment like ours to follow it.”

Uber, Argo AI, Aptiv and Aurora Innovation have tested self-driving cars in Pittsburgh.

The city can’t enforce Peduto’s rules and can’t regulate the testing of self-driving cars. That is up to state lawmakers, who haven’t passed any sort of regulations in the two years since Uber started openly testing self-driving cars on Pittsburgh’s streets.

Peduto has asked Uber adhere to the new guidelines. Uber has signaled a willingness to discuss the new rules.

Uber revealed this week it planned to resume testing in Pittsburgh in June. The company grounded its fleet in Pittsburgh, San Francisco, Toronto and Tempe, Ariz., after a self-driving Uber hit and killed a woman crossing a street in Tempe in March. The company stated it would not start testing until it completes an internal safety review and federal authorities finish their investigation into the March crash.

PennDOT Secretary Leslie Richards also has asked Uber to comply with voluntary guidelines she outlined at the start of the Pennsylvania Automated Vehicle Summit last month in Pittsburgh. Uber has committed to doing so, a PennDOT spokeswoman told the Trib.

Richards will hold a closed-door meeting Thursday with self-driving car companies at the Hotel Monaco in Pittsburgh’s Downtown to discuss testing guidelines the agency has proposed. Representatives from more than a dozen companies working on self-driving techonolgy plan to attend the meeting.

The guidelines are voluntary until state lawmakers pass regulations on autonomous vehicle testing.

Richards has said she expects companies to comply.

The guidelines include sharing information with the state about who is behind the wheel of test vehicles, which cars are involved and where, when and how they will be tested.

Aaron Aupperlee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected], 412-336-8448 or via Twitter @tinynotebook.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.