ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh Water & Sewer Authority drowning in debt, state audit finds |

Pittsburgh Water & Sewer Authority drowning in debt, state audit finds

| Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:54 p.m.
Bob Bauder | Tribune-Review
Pennsylvania Auditor General Eugene DePasquale
A contractor inspects water lines in Pittsburgh's Perry North neighborhood on Thursday, Aug. 10, 2017.

State Auditor General Eugene DePasquale released an audit Wednesday of the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority that echoed numerous problems that city officials have highlighted for years.

The authority is drowning in debt, beset with leaky water and sewer pipes that date back more than a century, has a dysfunctional management structure and needs a complete organizational makeover to right itself.

DePasquale said city government exerts major influence over PWSA operations. Each of the seven board members has ties to government operations, and four work for the city: Pittsburgh Finance Director Paul Leger, Personnel Director Debbie Lestitian, Treasurer Margaret Lanier and City Councilwoman Deb Gross.

“Either PWSA should be a separate independent authority and operate as such, or the city should operate the water and sewage system as part of the city’s functions,” DePasquale said.

Mayor Bill Peduto noted that the city owns the water and sewer systems.

“While the audit expresses concern with city government’s influence on PWSA, it is my duty to protect this valuable city asset and the safe water owed to the people I represent as mayor,” he said.

The findings came as no surprise to PWSA officials.

“The audit released today sheds light on the historical and structural conditions that have placed PWSA in a difficult position today,” said interim Executive Director Robert Weimar. “Fortunately, PWSA and its board of directors are currently taking action to stabilize infrastructure, invest in needed capital improvements, and adding to our leadership team who is committed to advancing the organization.”

The audit covered PWSA’s performance from 2014 through June.

Major findings include:

• A renegotiated lease agreement with the city in 1995 cost PWSA $101 million that went to plug holes in Pittsburgh’s operating budget. That bill added to PWSA’s debt — now more than $750 million — and it’s questionable whether a bank would offer it another loan.

• The authority invests about $31.4 million each year on average to repair aging infrastructure when it should be dedicating up to $200 million annually on capital improvements.

• PWSA provides city facilities — including the Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium — with up to 600 million gallons of free water each year. Authority officials are unsure exactly how much each facility uses because nobody meters it.

• Constant turnover of management and staff adds to the dysfunctional nature of PWSA.

PWSA needs an infusion of money — which can come only through rate increases — to fix its problems. DePasquale recommended a partnership with a private company to help offset the burden to ratepayers, but DePasquale acknowledged finding an interested, private partner could be difficult given the authority’s problems.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312, or via Twitter @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.