Plum High School teacher hires attorney who also represents Jerry Sandusky |

Plum High School teacher hires attorney who also represents Jerry Sandusky

Eric Felack | Valley News Dispatch
Butler County attorney Alexander Lindsay has been retained as the lawyer for the legal appeals of convicted sex offender Jerry Sandusky. Thursday, July 3, 2014.

A Plum High School teacher has hired an attorney who also represents Jerry Sandusky.

Drew Zoldak, 40, of New Kensington, has hired Butler county defense attorney Alexander H. Lindsay Jr. to defend him against charges of witness intimidation.

Lindsay also represents Sandusky in the former Penn State assistant football coach's post conviction relief act appeal of his conviction for molesting young boys.

Zoldak is accused of identifying a girl in his class as one who allegedly had sex with Joseph Ruggieri, 40, of Plum, an English teacher at the school charged with institutional sexual assault, corruption of minors and witness intimidation.

Zoldak is accused of blaming the girl for him having to be interviewed by investigators from the Allegheny County District Attorney's office. He is also accused of calling the girl to the front of the class and asking her if she would be “OK” with the class discussing sexual assault the following week.

Zoldak is suspended with pay.

Preliminary hearings for Zoldak and Ruggieri have been postponed both at the request of their attorneys, a secretary in Plum District Judge Linda Zucco's office said Tuesday morning.

The hearings had been scheduled for 9 a.m. Wednesday.

Ruggieri's preliminary hearing is now scheduled for May 20; Zoldak's is now scheduled for May 27.

R. Anthony DeLuca represents Ruggieri, who is suspended without pay.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.