ShareThis Page
Police: Penn Hills man had sexual relationship with 13-year-old |

Police: Penn Hills man had sexual relationship with 13-year-old

Allegheny County Jail
Christopher R. Labertew

A Penn Hills man is headed to court after police say he had ongoing sexual relations with a child.

Christopher R. Labertew, 20, is charged with felony counts of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, unlawful contact with a minor, statutory sexual assault, corruption of minors and related charges.

Labertew waived his right to a preliminary hearing Wednesday before District Judge Linda Inez Zucco in Plum.

Police said Labertew was engaged in an ongoing sexual relationship with a 13-year-old girl from August through November 2016. He was 19 at the time.

The victim told police that Labertew knew how old she was, according to court documents.

Labertew told police during a March 15 interview that he had been “dating” the victim for several months while he was staying at her home, court documents said.

Labertew admitted to the alleged sexual contact, according to court documents.

Labertew is free on bond. A formal arraignment is scheduled for July 26 in Pittsburgh.

Matthew Medsger is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4675, or via Twitter @matthew_medsger.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.