Port Authority awards $10.5 million engineering contract for Bus Rapid Transit project |

Port Authority awards $10.5 million engineering contract for Bus Rapid Transit project

A computer rendering of a Bus Rapid Transit stop in Pittsburgh

The Port Authority of Allegheny County’s board of directors hired a firm to perform engineering work for its Bus Rapid Transit project Friday.

The authority awarded the $10.5 million contract to Los Angeles-based AECOM, according to Adam Brandolph, an authority spokesman.

The $195.5 million Bus Rapid Transit project will connect Downtown to Oakland on electric buses that operate in their own lanes along Fifth and Forbes avenues.

AECOM responded to a publicly-advertised bid, Brandolph said. Pittsburgh-based Michael Baker International also submitted a proposal.

The agreement, expected to be finalized in August, is for three years with the option to extend the term up to two additional years at the authority’s discretion, Brandolph said.

The authority plans to receive about $100 million in funding from a Federal Transit Administration grant program, as well as $39 million in state funding and $28 million in local funding.

Authority officials plan to resubmit an application for the federal funding this fall, Brandolph said.

The authority plans to start construction in 2019 and have the system up and running in late 2021.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Theresa at 412-380-5669, [email protected] or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.