Pittsburgh Allegheny

Prospects poor for appealing decision against Pittsburgh’s police residency rule

Bob Bauder
By Bob Bauder
2 Min Read May 23, 2017 | 7 years Ago
Go Ad-Free today

A Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling striking down Pittsburgh's mandatory residency requirement for police officers likely goes into effect immediately, city and union officials said.

Mayor Bill Peduto said he was scheduled to meet with the city Law Department to discuss the ruling released Monday.

"On the face of it, it's immediate, but I want to confirm that with (solicitor Lourdes Sanchez Ridge)," he said.

Robert Swartzwelder, president of Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge 1, said he has no doubts.

"It's the law," Swartzwelder said.

The court upheld a 2014 ruling by an arbitration panel and a subsequent opinion of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas that said officers can live within 25 air miles of the City-County Building, Downtown.

25-mile radius around the Pittsburgh City-County Building

Swartzwelder said officers probably wouldn't depart the city in droves, but he expects a "steady exodus."

Police had sought the change in Pittsburgh's century-old residency requirement since 2002, Swartzwelder said.

In 2012, after lobbying by the FOP, state legislators changed a civil service law to say Pittsburgh "may require" an officer to become a resident as a condition of employment. The previous law said officers "shall be required" to live within city limits.

A previous police contract permitted the union to renegotiate the residency issue after the law changed. An arbitration panel stepped in when negotiations stalled and sided with the FOP, despite an overwhelming vote by residents that made the residency requirement part of the city's Home Rule Charter.

The Supreme Court ruled that state law superseded the Home Rule Charter requirement.

Peduto's administration has not decided whether to launch an appeal in federal court.

Swartzwelder predicted that federal courts would not take the case.

"There is no federal issue involved here," he said. "It's a state issue. The highest court you can go to is the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court has ruled."

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312, bbauder@tribweb.com or @bobbauder.

Share

About the Writers

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, bbauder@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Push Notifications

Get news alerts first, right in your browser.

Enable Notifications

Content you may have missed

Enjoy TribLIVE, Uninterrupted.

Support our journalism and get an ad-free experience on all your devices.

  • TribLIVE AdFree Monthly

    • Unlimited ad-free articles
    • Pay just $4.99 for your first month
  • TribLIVE AdFree Annually BEST VALUE

    • Unlimited ad-free articles
    • Billed annually, $49.99 for the first year
    • Save 50% on your first year
Get Ad-Free Access Now View other subscription options