Archive

Public Utility Commission hearing arguments against Lyft | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Public Utility Commission hearing arguments against Lyft

Judges from the state Public Utility Commission heard arguments Wednesday from several taxi companies protesting ride-sharing company Lyft’s attempt to get permanent approval.

The PUC approved a temporary 60-day approval for both Lyft and rival Uber to operate in Allegheny County earlier this month.

Both companies are seeking permanent legal status from the PUC.

Several taxi companies also protested Uber’s application at its hearing last week.

Taxi companies claim Lyft and Uber are creating an unlevel playing field because they are not subject to the same PUC rules.

“They don’t have to put the same expenses out – inspections, oil changes, they don’t have to buy decals. I have to do all of this; they don’t,” said Ronald Winkelvoss, president of several Philadelphia area taxi companies. “It’s unfair competition.”

The administrative law judges hearing the cases are expected to rule next month.

Lyft and Uber allow users to request a ride via a smartphone application from drivers providing rides in their personal vehicle.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.