ShareThis Page
PWSA had more than 100 water main breaks in first 2 weeks of January |

PWSA had more than 100 water main breaks in first 2 weeks of January

Frank J. Zottola Construction, Inc. was contracted by PWSA to dig up service lines of homes to see whether they were made of lead in Perry North on Thursday, August 10, 2017.

Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority has had to repair more than 100 water main breaks in the first two weeks of January — more than it repaired in the entire month of January 2017.

During the height of this month’s cold snap, PWSA was spending about $90,000 per day on contractors to keep up with the repairs, said Mora McLaughlin, a PWSA spokeswoman.

“These frigid days coinciding with warm spells have caused a rapid increase in water main breaks, damaged valves, and frozen pipes across PWSA’s water service area,” a PWSA news release said.

This is the coldest January on record for Pittsburgh, with a mean temperature of 18.4 degrees, the National Weather Service tweeted Jan. 17.

“When temperatures rise and fall continuously, we see a freezing and thawing of the pipes and the soil around them — this results in a greater chance of cracked pipes, especially with infrastructure that is an average of 90 years old,” interim Executive Director Robert Weimar said in the release.

Last January, the authority repaired 66 water mains and 30 service lines, the release said.

In the first two weeks of this January, PWSA repaired more than 100 water mains and dozens of service lines, the release said. On Jan. 16 alone, four PWSA crews and 10 contract crews were scheduled.

To update your contact info to receive PWSA robocalls to be notified of the work, visit this web page .

More information is available here .

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669, [email protected] or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.